The daily beast
The money monster that Mitch McConnell created eventually turned on him
Samuel Corum / Getty It turns out that Mitch McConnell doesn't really believe companies are people or that money speaks if the companies in question don't speak its language. Instead, he warned them to "stay out of politics" because "they will have dire consequences if they become a vehicle for the far-left crowd". Mitch, who later tried to distance himself from his comments because "I didn't say that wisely," is angry that major Georgia employers have finally responded to a voter suppression law that could well have been drafted. by Lester Maddox. Corporations have come out in favor of the controversial proposal in Republican circles that all Americans should have the right and freedom to choose, and McConnell didn't promise that when he spent the last three decades of war in the name of money. unregulated flow of business. "Right" to corrupt our democracy. As anyone who has seen his incredibly devastating career knows, what he meant by this was that these companies were happy to give Republicans money wheelbarrows to ease the burden of new business development. Political Ideas for Improving the Lives of Americans. and fix the problem. The right Christian brain behind Citizens United says it's good for democracy. That money also helps redeem the Senate Republicans, who happen to be the Republican leader's voters. This enabled McConnell to build a career in the Senate that could be viewed as a tribute to Seinfeld in the sense that absolutely nothing was discussed. Except electricity. As long as companies paid and shared the opinions he liked (low taxes, deregulation, free trade), Mitch was more of the "gossip, good CEO" type. The problem was that as our culture began to change, companies were also run by executives who believed in concepts as crazy as LGBTQ rights, equal pay and social security, and racial equality. At least he knew how to publicly support these regulations in order to attract his customers. On these matters, you can stay for McConnell the night but leave your check on the bedside table before you go home. To be fair, McConnell's principle in this position is that corporate donations are only good insofar as they are good for McConnell as long as he is involved in politics, as Alec MacGillis elaborated in The Cynic: The Political. Education from Mitch McConnell. . In 1973, McConnell published an editorial that partially promoted public campaign funding and spending restrictions. In 1987, Senator McConnell endorsed "a constitutional amendment that gave Congress the power to limit independent campaign spending and candidates' use of personal resources for their campaigns." own races. "(McConnell was far from wealthy at the time.) In 1990, he urged the ban on political action committees. It was at a time when the Democrats had absolute control of the House of Representatives. For nearly four decades, the PACS gave it Democrats more than Republicans. It happened to McConnell during his first Senate race in 1984. The incumbent Democrat he ousted, Walter "Dee" Huddleston, was favored by the PACS, much to McConnell's chagrin. But that would change once Mitch Mastering the art of shakedown, he opposed any campaign funding reform, challenged FEC rulings, and filed amicus letters contesting any contribution restrictions. This could end up in the Supreme Court. That way, you were a Citizens advocate United, if you think it carries over to your thinking about the business conversation al, the kind that came out of the Mouth comes out, not out of your wallet, think again. From an article I wrote in 2004 about the Senate whip at the time, McConnell: McConnell also knows how to deal with threats. When a group of Republican senators signed a campaign finance reform in the late 1990s, McConnell, as chairman of the NRSC, told them that they could not expect electoral support from the committee if they did not change their position. At least one, Senator Sam Brownback (R-Kan.), Did so after receiving McConnell's warning. Then, in 1999, when the Economic Development Committee (CED), a trade group representing large corporations, announced their support for a soft money ban, McConnell wrote an angry letter on the NRSC's letterhead to the CEOs of CED's own Company in which he denounced the group's "total campaign to withdraw private sector participation in politics" and called on them to withdraw from the organization. "Hope you left IBD," he scribbled at the end of a copy. Many recipients of the letter saw an implied threat that their companies would be treated unfavorably by Congress if they did not step out of the CED and no longer support reform efforts, which brings us back to the point. McConnell's alleged support for money in First Amendment policy. or some other similar principle. Isn't that. McConnell has no problem with the MyPillow guy reporting a hit or the Goya CEO approving the riot. But there is a big problem with corporate actors advocating the right to vote. Because, as 2020 has shown, McConnell's party is primarily targeting Fox News 'I've fallen and I can't stand up' demographics, not those who oppose, defend their position, and testify about fetuses in an America of transgender bans . Creating things requires a well-trained workforce, which means becoming more democratic and socially tolerant. And they need to attract disposable income consumers who actually buy products. Needless to say, these people typically don't live in the "Hannity demographics". So Mitch doesn't want these companies to talk. But as Georgia has shown, they will do it anyway as the alternative is to alienate their customers, and there aren't a ton of insane Republican tweets suggesting Major League Baseball is an offshoot of the "Chinese virus" that is forcing his customers. . The two-headed Dr. Seuss is about to change that fact, which all means that Mitch is finally reaping the whirlwind of corporate talks that he was so eager to unleash our politics when it benefited him and his party. Our best stories in your inbox every day. Join Now! Beast Daily Membership: Beast Inside is about the stories that matter to you. Learn more.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire